Brad Velander wrote:

So I am going where there seems to be a viable future with growth and 
improvement in the tools and their power.

Brad, that is where I think many 99SE evangelists disagree with you. I am interested in PCB & Schematics and nothing else. If the next version of the software can bring me coffee and cook my dinner, it will add no value to me. For PCB & SCH, DXP, 2004 and Designer have been steps backwards. I think there is no point in my reposting my fairly detailed explanation of why the changes are actually regressions. I doubt any 99SE power user can ever achieve the same speed with the newer packages.

As for your hope of continued growth and improvement for PCB & SCH, I would like to know what you are smoking. Have you be paying attention to Altium's actions rather than their propaganda? Was Altium there at PCB design expo? NO. They were down the street at Embedded Systems Conf pushing the FPGA stuff and did not have a single seat of PCB/Sch software at the boot -- not one. I know that because I tried to show them the issues that I had written about a few weeks ago and after 15 minutes of a search that most probably involved every single Altium employee at the boot, they finally admitted that they did not have a copy of the software that they could use to pull up either SCH or PCB. With this history, do you think they will keep supporting PCB & SCH if the FPGA business takes off? How will your "growth & improvement" future look when all PCB & SCH support is outsourced to your proverbial ESL team? Actually, they most probably can not nutter the software any worse than the current team has.

Regards,

Hamid





____________________________________________________________
You are subscribed to the PEDA discussion forum

To Post messages:
mailto:[email protected]

Unsubscribe and Other Options:
http://techservinc.com/mailman/listinfo/peda_techservinc.com

Browse or Search Old Archives (2001-2004):
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

Browse or Search Current Archives (2004-Current):
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

Reply via email to