And what is the price of the annual "maintenance fee" with PADS?

Tony



-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Joe Sapienza
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 9:50 AM
To: Protel EDA Discussion List
Subject: Re: [PEDA] New AD release

Bob,

You're very wrong about people never leaving. 34% of my retained customer 
have switched to PADS and from what I understand many more will jump ship if

this $3k upgrade goes into place.

Joe
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "bob stephens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Protel EDA Discussion List'" <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 12:23 PM
Subject: RE: [PEDA] New AD release


> You know, Altium has been f***ing over their existing user base for years
> (including me since 98), yet none of us ever leave... Apparently there's 
> no
> better alternative at this price point.
>
>
> Bob
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> On
> Behalf Of Dennis Saputelli
> Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 9:10 AM
> To: Protel EDA Discussion List
> Subject: Re: [PEDA] New AD release
>
>
> i got a call to join the web cast
> and give them money to upgrade
>
> she mentioned something like that the upgrade door would be closed (or 
> much
> more expensive if i didn't upgrade) at some date coming soon!
> ... end of this year i think she said
>
> i spent of good deal of money on 2 DXP/P2004 licenses which are still
> gathering dust i will probably changeover at some point but have not seen
> the urgent need as of yet
>
> i spent the money so that i could retain a reasonable cost of
> future-proofing which now seems in doubt - (^#*^(*^(*
>
> the sales person (can't remember her name, Alexis or some 'A') touted the
> FPGA integration over and over and could not seem to understand that since

> i
> have no need for this it had no value to me
>
> ds
>
> in case someone didn't get the email hype from them and is interested, 
> here
> is a snip from their email
>
> ****
> For more information on the scope of this new release, read the 'What's 
> New
> in Altium Designer 6.0' release document at
> http://www.altium.com/WhatsNew.pdf
>
> Alternatively, why not see for yourself the benefits that Altium Designer
> 6.0 brings to design by taking a look at the first in a series of 
> on-demand
> video feature demonstrations that showcase the highlights of the Altium
> Designer 6.0 release. You can view the videos at
> http://www.altium.com/altiumdesigner6demos.
>
>
>
> Brad Velander wrote:
>> Why is it that Altium always does this? Release confusing and
> contradictory information that simply riles and inflames their existing
> customer base. What a bunch of useless wankers!
>>
>> I would love to understand the mentioned licensing levels/versions
> but I couldn't find anything that explained it in their released
> information. Typical crap. I do not know if it was simply the existing AD
> verses Nexar, verses viewer licensing or something new that would allow
> licensing of a package of PCB/Sch features without all the FPGA stuff that
> we will never use. But no, they release a bunch of double talk that says
> nothing intelligent and imparts no useful information. Even the whole idea
> of the release announcement is misconstrued and totally untrue. Wankers!
>>
>> Sincerely,
>> Brad Velander
>> Senior PCB Designer
>> Northern Airborne Technology
>> #14 - 1925 Kirschner Road,
>> Kelowna, BC, V1Y 4N7.
>> tel (250) 763-2329 ext. 225
>> fax (250) 762-3374
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Harry Selfridge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 5:11 PM
>> To: Protel EDA Discussion List
>> Subject: Re: [PEDA] New AD release
>>
>>
>> There is no new release yet - despite the press release.  The new
>> version of AD is still in Beta testing.
>>
>>
>> At 04:42 PM 12/6/2005, you wrote:
>>
>>>Anyone had a chance at looking at the new AD release?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Cheers
>>>
>>>Alfonso
>>
>> snip
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You are subscribed to the PEDA discussion forum
>
> To Post messages:
> mailto:[email protected]
>
> Unsubscribe and Other Options:
> http://techservinc.com/mailman/listinfo/peda_techservinc.com
>
> Browse or Search Old Archives (2001-2004):
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
>
> Browse or Search Current Archives (2004-Current):
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You are subscribed to the PEDA discussion forum
>
> To Post messages:
> mailto:[email protected]
>
> Unsubscribe and Other Options:
> http://techservinc.com/mailman/listinfo/peda_techservinc.com
>
> Browse or Search Old Archives (2001-2004):
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
>
> Browse or Search Current Archives (2004-Current):
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
> 


 
____________________________________________________________
You are subscribed to the PEDA discussion forum

To Post messages:
mailto:[email protected]

Unsubscribe and Other Options:
http://techservinc.com/mailman/listinfo/peda_techservinc.com

Browse or Search Old Archives (2001-2004):
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
 
Browse or Search Current Archives (2004-Current):
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]





 
____________________________________________________________
You are subscribed to the PEDA discussion forum

To Post messages:
mailto:[email protected]

Unsubscribe and Other Options:
http://techservinc.com/mailman/listinfo/peda_techservinc.com

Browse or Search Old Archives (2001-2004):
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
 
Browse or Search Current Archives (2004-Current):
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

Reply via email to