Hello Edwina, List,

I don't see the whole conversation as a coherent thread, so I've missed the 
back and forth.

In short, I support the general claim that we can view the evolution of the 
cosmos as manifesting, at both local and global levels, the dynamics of complex 
adaptive systems. The hypothesis I see Peirce trying out in, for instance, A 
Guess at the Riddle, is that the evolution of the cosmos has a character 
analogous to the dynamics of the cycle of inquiry:  manifesting patterns akin 
to hypothesis, deduction, and induction, as the drive or growth, and patterns 
akin to demonstration on the basis of systems of principles (i.e., theories) 
where established habits and natural laws govern. This, I think, is a 
hypothesis that has proven to be fruitful in many domains, and I suspect its 
fruitfulness will continue to growth in this century.

Having said that, I not prepared to go so far as to say:  "There is no goal, no 
final agenda, other than to prevent entropic dissipation of energy, and thus, 
maintain the energy content of the universe as ‘matter’ moulded within the 
self-organized  rules of Mind." On my view, potential is a pretty rich sort of 
thing. As such, it isn't clear to me how much or how little of the evolution of 
ordered habits and growth of systems of laws manifests something more than a 
constraint that prevents the "prevent entropic dissipation of energy,."

For my part, I see these sorts of questions as an invitation to engage in 
inquiry. The proof of the pudding will be in the tasting the results of those 
inquiries. For those taking up this sort of project, including the many at SFI, 
we have our work cut out for us.

Yours,

Jeff


________________________________
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of 
Edwina Taborsky <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, October 25, 2025 1:34 PM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Cc: Edwina Taborsky <[email protected]>
Subject: [PEIRCE-L] The Universe as a CAS

I am still stunned by the recent rejection of my claim that the Universe is a 
CAS  [ complex adaptive system] by three scholars on this list - none of whom 
had the faintest idea what a CAS actually is.

Here’s a brief outline:

Complex adaptive systems (CAS) represent a framework for understanding how 
intricate, dynamic networks of interacting agents give rise to emergent 
behaviors that are greater than the sum of their parts. These systems are 
characterized by decentralized control, adaptation through learning or 
evolution, nonlinear interactions, and the ability to self-organize in response 
to environmental changes. In essence, CAS thrive on feedback loops, diversity, 
and resilience, often exhibiting unpredictable yet patterned outcomes. This 
concept, popularized by thinkers like John Holland and Murray Gell-Mann through 
the Santa Fe Institute, transcends disciplines, offering insights into 
everything from ant colonies to stock markets.

My point of course, is that Peirce’s semiosic framework, made up of the basic 
triad of an ‘information unit’, [O-S-I] … comparable to those ‘interacting 
agents in the CAS - operating within the three categories of Firstness, 
Secondness and Thirdness function within a decentralized and non-determined 
process ,[bottom up]  adaptation through ‘learning and evolution’ , non-linear 
interactions..and self-organization..to develop and maintain our universe.

There is no goal, no final agenda, other than to prevent entropic dissipation 
of energy, and thus, maintain the energy content of the universe as ‘matter’ 
moulded within the self-organized  rules of Mind.  I therefore think that it 
would be interesting if not productive to explore this dynamic, using the 
Peircean basic framework, within not only the biological realm - but- even the 
societal, economic and political realms.

Edwina


_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON 
PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . 
►  <a href="mailto:[email protected]";>UNSUBSCRIBE FROM PEIRCE-L</a> . 
But, if your subscribed email account is not your default email account, then 
go to
https://list.iu.edu/sympa/signoff/peirce-l .
► PEIRCE-L is owned by THE PEIRCE GROUP;  moderated by Gary Richmond;  and 
co-managed by him and Ben Udell.

Reply via email to