Clark wrote: "But there can be signs of mind and not matter. (073114-1) Thats more the issue Im getting at."
Can there be any signs of mind independent of matter or unsupported by material mechanisms of some sort ? If so, what would be an example of that ? With all the best. Sung __________________________________________________ Sungchul Ji, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Pharmacology and Toxicology Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy Rutgers University Piscataway, N.J. 08855 732-445-4701 www.conformon.net > >> On Jul 31, 2014, at 12:19 PM, Søren Brier <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> My I add a few thoughts? I agree that sign are reals, but when they >> manifests as tokens their Secondness must enter the world of physics and >> thermodynamics must apply. It is work to make signs emerge in non-verbal >> communication or as language from ones feeling and thoughts. Even to >> produces thoughts and feeling demands work. That would be a biosemiotic >> view (but one that we have not discussed much). But I think you are >> correct in saying that Peirce did not do any work on this aspect of sign >> production. > > Again this gets at ontological issues. Remember Peirces conception of > mind and matter which gets a bit tricky. The world of physics is the world > of matter which is mind under habit. But there can be signs of mind and > not matter. Thats more the issue Im getting at.
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
