Thread Patch:
FS:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/13825
JA:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/13826
JBD:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/13971
JA:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/13974
Peircers,
Those bracketed index numbers from the bi-semiotics list have the unhappy effect of breaking up the
"Natural Threads" of this discussion, at least as I view them in my various scopes, so I will paste
this little bit of fray back in the place where I am more likely to find it again.
Jon
Jeff & All,
With regard to "non-psychologism", it was a slip on my part to use that term. I don't think I've
ever used it before. At any rate I will try to avoid using it again. It may sound like a trivial
difference but I think there is a significant point to using the adjective "non-psychological" in
Peirce's "non-psychological conception of logic" as distinguished from all the dualing and dueling
substantives of isms and anti-isms. I sense that I've written about this many times before, so I
will leave it at that.
A similar point applies to "relativism" of course, debates about which are as interminable as they
are inconsequential, ever missing the whole idea of Peirce's relational perspective on everything.
Regards,
Jon
--
academia: http://independent.academia.edu/JonAwbrey
my word press blog: http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/
inquiry list: http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/
isw: http://intersci.ss.uci.edu/wiki/index.php/JLA
oeiswiki: http://www.oeis.org/wiki/User:Jon_Awbrey
facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/JonnyCache
-----------------------------
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the
line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
