Clark wrote: "Material science for instance is part of physics and has examples more in line with that."
I did not get he point you are trying to get across. Can you elaborate on it ? Thanks. Sung > On Sep 11, 2014, at 6:41 PM, Sungchul Ji <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> However, I claim that >> >> ÂUnlike DNA, Âentropy does not have any agent, (091114-4) >> other than humans, for which it can act as a sign. > > Just to add, while this may be true of foundational physical concepts, we > should note that physics isnât just theoretical physics. Material > science for instance is part of physics and has examples more in line with > that. However I took Frederick to be talking foundational theoretical > physics. > > The way you are presenting it any physical structures that have an agent > relationship (i.e. mediation) would act as a sign. Of course in cosmology > and much else one can find that sort of thing. Just not in foundational > physics unless you take the time evolution of the symmetry formings in the > universe within cosmology as doing that.
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
