Jon wrote: A nominalist in name only would be a nominal nominalist. But a real nominalist would be a contradiction in terms.
Sometimes it seems to me that the cleverness of your wit approaches the profound, Jon. Or, as Frederik just wrote regarding the above, great! Best, Gary Gary Richmond Philosophy and Critical Thinking Communication Studies LaGuardia College of the City University of New York C 745 718 482-5690 *** *** *** *** >>> Frederik Stjernfelt 09/21/14 1:31 PM >>> great! F Den 20/09/2014 kl. 05.01 skrev Jon Awbrey > : A nominalist in name only would be a nominal nominalist. But a real nominalist would be a contradiction in terms. Checkmate ... Jon
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
