List, Frederik, Jeff:

On Oct 4, 2014, at 3:22 PM, Jeffrey Brian Downard wrote:
(citing CSP), 

> "icons commit themselves to nothing at all"

This is a clear and crisp example of the influence of historical usage on the 
meaning of words, grammar, signs, symbols, terms, expressions, logic and so 
forth.

In modern chemistry, the principle icons are chemical structures that 
correspond exactly with indices, rhemata, decisigns, arguments, legisigns, the 
symbols of the chemical table of elements and the sinsign as the source of 
qualisigns.

Furthermore, chemical icons, at a deeper abstract level, are a direct 
consequence of physical laws and physical experimentation and chemical 
mathematics of the atomic numbers.

Chemists call an icon a chemical identity and, and as a class, chemical 
identities are the basis for the formal logic of mathematical chemistry and a 
form of logic of relatives developed from the conceptualization of matter as 
atoms with unique properties.

 CSP (1839-1914?) died long before chemists learned construct chemical icons 
from the indices representing electrical units and integers.  

Cheers

Jerry





-----------------------------
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L 
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To 
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with the 
line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at 
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .




Reply via email to