Danko - I took the liberty of forwarding your paper to the Biosemiotics list; I think that it has important issues for that list. Biosemiotics uses Peircean theory.
[email protected] Edwina ----- Original Message ----- From: Danko Nikolic To: Jon Awbrey ; [email protected] Sent: Sunday, March 29, 2015 1:36 PM Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Re: Inquiry Driven Systems : Pragmatic Approach To Inquiry Dear Jon, I have just read your paper. (The paper has the advantage of being very short.) I relation to this paper, I surmise that the theory of practopoiesis: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002251931500106X tells us how this abduction-capable computer program that you described should be structured. The theory tells us what components it needs to have, and how they should interact among themselves and with the outside world (my paper is much longer than yours, but one may take a look first at section 3.4 " A T3-system: Anapoiesis and abduction—The mind"). My question for the peirce-l community is: Does it make sense? Danko ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
