Danko, List, Had only a chance to scan your paper. Just at first glance it looks like a mashup of all the usual mainstream speculations since the early days of "naval gazing":
in NYTimes.com http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=9D01E4D8173DE53BBC4053DFB1668383649EDE That's OK, done a lot of that myself. But Peirce's theories of signs and inquiry will require some departure from the mainstream. Perhaps it would serve to focus on a single component that we both agree is central, say, the capacity to form models of the environment. I have been concerned with software applications that can assist inquiry so I'm always asking "How would I write a program (algorithm + data structures) for that? In other news: Michigan State 57 Louisville 51 6:45 to play Jon > On Mar 29, 2015, at 12:36 PM, Danko Nikolic <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Dear Jon, > > I have just read your paper. (The paper has the advantage of being very > short.) > > I relation to this paper, I surmise that the theory of practopoiesis: > > http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002251931500106X > > tells us how this abduction-capable computer program that you described > should be structured. The theory tells us what components it needs to have, > and how they should interact among themselves and with the outside world (my > paper is much longer than yours, but one may take a look first at section 3.4 > " A T3-system: Anapoiesis and abduction—The mind"). > > My question for the peirce-l community is: > > Does it make sense? > > Danko > > >> On 29/03/15 19:10, Jon Awbrey wrote: >> Danko, List, >> >> Here's a conference paper and slides that Susan Awbrey and I presented on >> computational architectures for inquiry: >> >> https://www.academia.edu/1270327/An_Architecture_for_Inquiry_Building_Computer_Platforms_for_Discovery >> >> Regards, >> >> Jon >> >> http://inquiryintoinquiry.com >> >>>> On Mar 29, 2015, at 9:30 AM, Jon Awbrey <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Danko, List, >>>> >>>> Collateral reading on the three types of reasoning in Aristotle and Peirce: >>>> >>>> http://intersci.ss.uci.edu/wiki/index.php/Functional_Logic_:_Inquiry_and_Analogy >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Jon >>>> >>>> http://inquiryintoinquiry.com >>>> >>>> On Mar 27, 2015, at 5:20 PM, Jon Awbrey <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Danko, List, >>>> >>>> Here is a section from one of my early drafts on Inquiry Driven Systems >>>> that may add some ideas to the recent discussion. >>>> >>>> http://intersci.ss.uci.edu/wiki/index.php/Introduction_to_Inquiry_Driven_Systems#The_Pragmatic_Approach_to_Inquiry >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Jon >>>> >>>> http://inquiryintoinquiry.com > > > -- > Prof. Dr. Danko Nikolić > > Web: > http://www.danko-nikolic.com > > Mail address 1: > Department of Neurophysiology > Max Planck Institut for Brain Research > Deutschordenstr. 46 > 60528 Frankfurt am Main > GERMANY > > Mail address 2: > Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies > Wolfgang Goethe University > Ruth-Moufang-Str. 1 > 60433 Frankfurt am Main > GERMANY > > ---------------------------- > Office: (..49-69) 96769-736 > Lab: (..49-69) 96769-209 > Fax: (..49-69) 96769-327 > [email protected] > ----------------------------
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
