Edwina, List: Thank you for the book suggestion, I will look into it. However ...
EDWINA: If the Dynamic Interpretant is in a mode of Thirdness, then, the Final won't be in a mode of Firstness! This is what we agreed earlier; but it entails that destinate=final and explicit=immediate. SPINKS, p. 197: the Destinate Interpretant becomes the Immediate Interpretant of the fifth trichotomy, the Effective Interpretant becomes the Dynamical Interpretants (Active and Passive) of the sixth and seventh trichotomoies, and the Explicit Interpretant becomes the eight, ninth and tenth trichtomoies dealing with the "Normal Interpretant" If this is correct--and I thought it was until yesterday--then the order is Ii => Id => In; i.e., if the dynamic interpretant is in a mode of Thirdness, then the final interpretant CAN be in in a mode of Firstness. Again, we agreed earlier that this is NOT the case. The adjustment to my notation (=> rather than >) reflects the fact that the adicity of each trichotomy (1, 2, or 3) must always be equal to or less than that of its predecessor. Regards, Jon
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
