Helmut, list,
The immediate, dynamical, and final interpretants are 1st, 2nd, and 3rd,
respectively, in their trichotomy, and abduction, induction, and
deduction are usually considered 1st, 2nd, and 3rd, respectively in
their trichotomy. So they align in some sense; they rhyme, 1st with 1st,
2nd with 2nd, and 3rd with 3rd, as ideas. On the other hand, for my part
I haven't noticed a particular functional connection among those two
trichotomies.
Best, Ben
On 11/9/2015 12:47 PM, Helmut Raulien wrote:
Ben, List,
I am sorry for having not known this (scientifical) meaning of
"degenerate". Now, do you think, that abduction, induction, and
deduction somehow can be assigned to the immediate, dynamical, and
final interpretant? In this case, maybe, every sign "posesses" these
three inferences, because: Quote from the guide for the perplexed,
page 84: "And, as Peirce further explains, the immediate, dynamic, and
final interpretant "are posessed by every sign" (R339:287r).". Well,
maybe it also depends on what "posessed" in this case means?
Best,
Helmut
09. November 2015 um 15:01 Uhr
Benjamin Udell wrote
-----------------------------
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the
line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
