Jon A.S. : On Dec 8, 2015, at 2:22 PM, Jon Alan Schmidt wrote: > In other words, a qualisign is always and only an icon; it can never be an > index or a symbol.
Are you missing a critical presupposition here? What did CSP intend for these three trichotomies? Is each component of the three trichotomies a term in a premiss or in the set of premisses that form an argument? Is it necessary that any conclusion of the argument must be consistent with the set of legisigns used in the premisses?. Is it necessary that, for any particular situation, these three trichotomies form a relational product? Is it possible that during the concatenation of intermediate terms of the set of premises, that one of the terms may be substituted for another term? In other words, in the logical manipulations of terms within CSP's relational algebra, is it possible that products are substituted for relational products? Cheers Jerry
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
