> On Dec 14, 2015, at 3:08 AM, Matt Faunce <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On 12/13/15 6:24 PM, Franklin Ransom wrote:
>> Human languages differ with respect to the rules of construction and the 
>> things that can be said, and they also develop and evolve over time; the 
>> development of a language to the point where it can articulate scientific 
>> terminology is not a development shared by every human language.
>> 
> Can you give your source for this? I remember reading the opposite from two 
> different linguists. Michael Shapiro is one. (I'd have to search for the 
> exact statements, but the keyword I'd use is 'passkey'.) Edward Vajda writes
> 
> " Human language is unlimited in its expressive capacity."
> 
> "Today, it is quite obvious that people living with Stone Age technology 
> speak languages as complex and versatile as those spoken in the most highly 
> industrialized society.  There are no primitive languages.  Virtually no 
> linguist today would disagree with this statement."

I don’t know about that quote in particular. However a decade or so back 
Michael Tomasello had a fascinating book on the evolution of language in The 
Cultural Origins of Human Cognition. While he doesn’t speak of it in Peircean 
terms he creates a model where it appears a certain kind of thirdness in terms 
of interpretation of signs develops. Once that evolves then he sees language’s 
capabilities as being largely there and develops fast. It’s been a while since 
I read it but I think he keeps the traditional dating of the evolution of 
language to around 80,000 - 100,000 years. The evolution after that is really 
developing the language and culture once you have the capability.

I know he has a newer text based upon some lectures he gave called The Origins 
of Human Communication although I’ve not read that one.
-----------------------------
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L 
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To 
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the 
line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at 
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .




Reply via email to