Jon, list, That's a beautiful way of putting it and I completely agree. The only place where I disagree is about where one should go to find that example by which to sharpen up our awareness for articulating complexity of inquiry processes, for there must be many options available to us.
However, if the goal is to sharpen up our abilities to the point where we can make a significant difference in understanding *real-world phenomena* and the problems they present to us, one that honors the details left by the Greek masters, then we ought to look at an example that covers those areas. Phi spiral abduction is a real-world phenomenon that honors that. It’s an inquiry about a real-world phenomena that has “wings”. It is a question that has interest in justice. “The occasion and the question cannot be separated…what keeps them together is the philosopher’s self-knowledge, which essentially depends on maintaining a double vision. What is it and what good is it? Eros is the name for this double vision. It is the bond between what is to be known and what it means to know it. It consists in the acknowledgment that the separation needed for understanding and the union desired for satisfaction cannot be naturally overcome. To have the erotic art is to have the capacity to get absorbed in the question at hand and never forget oneself. ” ~Seth Benardete, starting ~32:38 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rioS0H-EHdw one, two, three…Beauty, Goodness, Justice Best, Jerry Rhee On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Jon Awbrey <[email protected]> wrote: > Jerry, List, > > I just think that the tools Peirce gave us for articulating > complex cases of inquiry processes, as mediated by complex > cases of triadic sign relations, are worth sharpening up > to the point where we can make a significant difference > in our understanding of real-world phenomena and the > problems they present to us. > > Doing all that requires us to pore over the details of what > Peirce, and even Aristotle, and even by implication Plato's > Socrates had to say about the properties of the three basic > types of inference, all the while sorting out the degree to > which their observations and guesses and deductions fit the > bill of the pragmatic maxim well enough to be judged useful. > > Regards, > > Jon > > Inquiry Blog: > • > http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2012/08/16/abduction-deduction-induction-analogy-inquiry-1/ > • > http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2012/11/21/abduction-deduction-induction-analogy-inquiry-2/ > • > http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2016/02/17/abduction-deduction-induction-analogy-inquiry-3/ > • > http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2016/02/26/abduction-deduction-induction-analogy-inquiry-4/ > • > http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2016/02/29/abduction-deduction-induction-analogy-inquiry-5/ > • > http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2016/02/29/abduction-deduction-induction-analogy-inquiry-6/ > • > http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2016/03/01/abduction-deduction-induction-analogy-inquiry-7/ > • > http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2016/03/02/abduction-deduction-induction-analogy-inquiry-8/ > > Peirce List: > JA:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/9017 > JA:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/18439 > JA:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/18442 > JA:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/18444 > JLRC:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/18445 > JA:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/18447 > KM:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/18448 > JA:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/18449 > JLRC:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/18450 > JLRC:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/18451 > ET:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/18452 > JA:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/18453 > JR:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/18454 > FK:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/18455 > ET:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/18456 > MK:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/18457 > ET:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/18458 > CG:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/18459 > GR:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/18460 > JR:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/18461 > ET:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/18462 > JR:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/18463 > ET:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/18464 > JR:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/18465 > JR:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/18466 > JA:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/18467 > JA:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/18468 > JR:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/18469 > JA:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/18470 > JR:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/18471 > > > -- > > academia: http://independent.academia.edu/JonAwbrey > my word press blog: http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/ > inquiry list: http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/ > isw: http://intersci.ss.uci.edu/wiki/index.php/JLA > oeiswiki: http://www.oeis.org/wiki/User:Jon_Awbrey > facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/JonnyCache >
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
