Thanks for your patience Edwina,

I dislike political correctness, too.

OK, if your objection is that it lacks a middle term, then C is the middle
term because starting with the premise, B = surprise or suspect,

B (surprise) is C
A is C
Therefore, B (suspicious) is A

Will this do other than whether you agree on B = surprise or suspect?

Thanks again,
Jerry R



On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 7:47 PM, Edwina Taborsky <[email protected]> wrote:

> No, it is not a syllogism. It lacks a middle term.
>
> Again, to use the basic syllogistic example:
>
> All men are wise
> Socrates is a man
> Therefore, Socrates is wise.
>
> Three terms: Socrates; man; wise.
> Note that the middle term of 'man' appears in both the major and minor
> premises. Your IF-THEN proposition does not have a middle term.
>
> Your attempt to say that *he is transformed by the argument* [Note: I
> dislike political correctness; the pronoun 'he' is gender neutral'] doesn't
> introduce a third term.
>
> And
>
> Your example has no middle term. Furthermore, it has FOUR terms:
> A, C, surprise, suspicious.
> There's no such thing as a four-term syllogism. [Fallacy of Four Terms]
>
> Edwina
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Jerry Rhee <[email protected]>
> *To:* Edwina Taborsky <[email protected]>
> *Cc:* Peirce-L <[email protected]>
> *Sent:* Saturday, April 23, 2016 8:25 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [PEIRCE-L] Is CP 5.189 a syllogism?
>
> Thanks Edwina,
>
> Is that the only objection?
>
> So, the thing I think Peirce intended is that (surprise, suspect) is the
> third term, because a person (B) is surprised or suspicious.  That person
> is the same, that is, one person but she is transformed during the argument.
>
> So,
>
> Surprise is C
> A is C
> Therefore, Suspicious is A
>
> Does that work?
>
> Thanks,
> Jerry R
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 7:13 PM, Edwina Taborsky <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> No, it is not a syllogism. A syllogism has THREE terms. Your example has
>> two. A syllogism is in the format of
>> Major Premise
>> Minor Premise
>> Conclusion
>>
>> All M is P
>> S is M
>> Therefore S is P
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> Your example is in the form of Propositional Logic, or IF-THEN logic.
>>
>> If p then q
>> p
>> Therefore q
>>
>> Or, If A then C
>> A
>> Therefore C
>> This is called the *modus ponens*.
>>
>> So, it would be
>>  IF A is true, then C is a matter of course
>> [I surmise that] A is true
>> Therefore, C is a matter of course.
>>
>> Edwina
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> *From:* Jerry Rhee <[email protected]>
>> *To:* Peirce-L <[email protected]>
>> *Sent:* Saturday, April 23, 2016 7:12 PM
>> *Subject:* [PEIRCE-L] Is CP 5.189 a syllogism?
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I'm trying to figure something out.  I've convinced myself but am not
>> completely sure, so would like to work this out with the community.
>>
>> I haven't read Aristotle.  Are there steadfast rules to syllogism one
>> must never ever break or is there an essence?  What is the intention of
>> syllogism?
>>
>> Would you say the following is a syllogism?  Why or why not?
>>
>> The surprising fact, C, is observed.
>> But if A were true, C would be a matter of course.
>> Hence, there is reason to suspect that A is true.
>>
>> Thanks for any input,
>> Jerry Rhee
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>>
>> -----------------------------
>> PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
>> PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to
>> [email protected] . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L
>> but to [email protected] with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the
>> BODY of the message. More at
>> http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
-----------------------------
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L 
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To 
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the 
line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at 
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .




Reply via email to