List, Clark, Kirsti, Ben, Frederik: The recent mention by Clark of Parker’s book, “Continuity…” re-opens the question of how Parker categorized CSP’s writings.
Of particular interest is Parker’s division of the three periods of meanings: Fig. 6.2: 1865-1885 Fig. 6.3: 1885-1902 Fig. 6.4: 1902-1914 in relation to CSP's conceptualization of the meaning of logic. In particular, Parker’s separation of the logic of the semeiotic into: The logic of icons The logic of indices The logic of symbols. My questions are: How do Parker's separation of the forms of CSP logics relate to FS's views of Natural Propositions? Can one find an illation between Parker’s reading of CSP and FS’s reading of CSP’s propositional functions? Any STRUCTURAL clues would be warmly welcomed. Cheers Jerry
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
