Jerry C, list:
The propositional functions are embedded but you have to recognize the beauty to induce the labor. “The little matter of distinguishing one, two, and three --in a word, number and *calculation*: --do not all arts and sciences necessarily partake of them? Yes.” ~Republic “This difficulty is to some extent overcome by the fact that one virtue is the highest, and that virtue is called knowledge or science… by conceiving of knowledge as the *calculation* of pleasures. We all seek only pleasure, that is the assumption. We want a maximum of pleasure without any moral conversion, merely by greater shrewdness and calculation, i.e., by greater intelligence, by science, a calculus of pleasures. This is the theme of the *Protagoras*.” ~Leo Strauss on Plato’s Symposium one, two, three…love of honor, love of goodness, love of truth…logic of icon, logic of index, logic of symbol… Hth, Jerry Rhee On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Jerry LR Chandler < [email protected]> wrote: > Jerry R: > > > On Jun 16, 2016, at 11:47 PM, Jerry Rhee <[email protected]> wrote: > > Does this qualify? > > C = phi spiral and not M51, poet, promise > A = FEM model and not Netlogo, scientist, > performance > B = Structural optimization of corneal stroma, philosopher, truth > > > Your attempts to decipher the meaning of this critical logic term by > throwing conjectures at it are a most unusual approach, to say the least. > > May I suggest you take a day or two and study the origin and meaning of > the term “propositional function”? Such a study could add substantially to > your understanding of your own work. > > Cheers > Jerry C. > > > > Best, > Jerry R > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 11:44 PM, Jerry LR Chandler < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Jerry R: >> >> On Jun 16, 2016, at 1:57 PM, Jerry Rhee <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I've never read FS but if the question is *what is it that is being >> interpreted by two different interpreters for that which is claimed to be >> different but assumed to belong to the same whol*e, then you ought to >> consider the following from Strauss, Bloom and Benardete: >> >> >> Thank you for considering the query. >> >> But, that is not my question. >> >> I seek a premise, a propositional function. >> >> Cheers >> >> Jerry >> > > > ----------------------------- > PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON > PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to > [email protected] . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L > but to [email protected] with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the > BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm > . > > > > > >
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
