Jon, I suppose that settles it then. For what is stated in your response is how to make our ideas clear, or one over many.
Best, JR On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 8:15 PM, Jon Alan Schmidt <jonalanschm...@gmail.com> wrote: > Jerry R., List: > > JR: Is it your claim, then, that the actual proposition should matter? > > > All I am saying is that the title of Peirce's article strongly suggests > that it is primarily about a neglected argument for the Reality of God. > > Regards, > > Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA > Professional Engineer, Amateur Philosopher, Lutheran Layman > www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt - twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt > > On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 6:13 PM, Jerry Rhee <jerryr...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Jon, list: >> >> >> >> You said: >> >> “ I find it rather implausible that a work entitled "A Neglected >> Argument for the Reality of God" was somehow intended to be more about "the >> *attitude *and *method *from which all decisions of importance to the >> conduct of a life should begin," such that the content of the hypothesis >> itself is secondary or even irrelevant.” >> >> >> >> That is an interesting statement. Is it your claim, then, that the >> actual proposition should matter? >> >> >> >> If it matters so much, then, what is it for this situation, the >> proposition/hypothesis; that thing that makes the matter answerable? >> >> >> That is, if "The hypothesis cannot be admitted, even as a hypothesis, >> unless it be supposed that it would account for the facts or some of them?" >> what is the argument in logical form for the NA? Where is the beginning of >> such a thing? >> >> Thanks, >> Jerry R >> >
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
