Also see Peirce discussing the difference between logical classification and natural classification in "Triadomany", CP 1.568-572
http://www.textlog.de/4336.html

Best, Ben

On 9/29/2016 2:19 PM, Jon Alan Schmidt wrote:
Mike, List:

Glad to be of service! In the meantime, you might review Peirce's extensive discussion of "natural classes" and "natural classification" at CP 1.203-231.

Regards,

Jon

On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Mike Bergman <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Fantastic, Jon. That would be most helpful, especially since that
    is "new" information.

    Mike

    On 9/29/2016 11:32 AM, Jon Alan Schmidt wrote:
    Mike, List:

    As it happens, I am currently in the process of reading and
    transcribing R 1343, "Of the Classification of the Sciences,
    Second Paper, Of the Practical Sciences," once again thanks to
    the SPIN project
    (http://fromthepage.com/collection/show?collection_id=16
    <http://fromthepage.com/collection/show?collection_id=16>). So
    far, about 40 pages into it, it presents instead a classification
    of instincts; but if I remember right, it also includes some
    discussion about principles of classification.  I do not have my
    in-progress transcription with me at the office, but if I get a
    chance this evening, I will review it and post anything relevant
    that I find.

    Regards,

    Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
    Professional Engineer, Amateur Philosopher, Lutheran Layman
    www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt
    <http://www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt> -
    twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt <http://twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt>

    On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Mike Bergman
    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        Hi List,

        Ben Udell recently quoted from this Peirce memoir:

            MEMOIR   27: OF METHODEUTIC

            [....]

            From Draft B - MS L75.279-280

            [....] Two other problems of methodeutic which the old
            logics usually made almost its only business are, first,
            the principles of definition, and of rendering ideas
            clear; and second, the principles of classification.
            [End quote]

        I have only found spotty references by Peirce to the
        "principles of classification" in my own online resources.
        Would anyone on the list care (Edwina ? :) ) to provide any
        of their own known citations?

        Thanks in advance,

        Mike

-----------------------------
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L 
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To 
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the 
line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at 
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .




Reply via email to