> On Dec 12, 2016, at 3:17 PM, Jerry LR Chandler <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
>> On Dec 12, 2016, at 3:48 PM, Clark Goble <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> On Dec 12, 2016, at 12:20 PM, Jerry LR Chandler 
>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> One critical fact that is “the elephant in the room” is the intrinsic 
>>> asymmetry of nearly all biomolecules. Life Itself depends on the 
>>> asymmetries entailed from parent to offspring and the offsprings capacity 
>>> to reproduce these quantum asymmetries through the energetic casual 
>>> electric field relations among discrete molecules.  (This is the 
>>> well-established quantum physics of optical isomers, of the handedness of 
>>> biophilic and biogenic hyle.)
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Could you expand on this? 
> 
> 
> In the simplest possible cases, the magnitude of the handedness of a 
> biophilic molecule is a function of five mathematical objects, all of which 
> must be different from the other four. 
> 
> No group operation is possible on the order of the five different objects of 
> a handed biophilic / biogenic component of the anatomy of the identity.
> 
> BTW, this argument (expansion) is part of a manuscript recently submitted for 
> publication.
> As you may recall, the paper on the perplex number system was published 
> several years ago.  It has taken me  more than 15 years to unentangle the 
> connections between CSP logical reference system for assertions (perhaps 
> syllogisms?) that illate legisigns for handedness to one another via the 
> atomic numbers. 

But isn’t the particular handedness itself a result of symmetry breaking? (I’ll 
confess I’m completely ignorant of this chemistry) That is to get an asymmetry 
presupposes something first broke a symmetry.


-----------------------------
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L 
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To 
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the 
line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at 
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .




Reply via email to