That’s interesting. I was familiar with Derrida’s and of course Habermas but I
didn’t know there were others.
In Germany there were e.g. Herbert Marcuse, Jürgen von Kempski, Max Bense, his
wife Elisabeth Walther-Bense, the late Karl-Otto Apel, Klaus Oehler or Helmut
Pape.
Best,
Stefan
Am 31.07.17 um 22:31 schrieb Clark Goble:
On Jul 31, 2017, at 12:52 PM, kirst...@saunalahti.fi wrote:
In my view Gary R. is gravely wrong in assuming that CSP was all his life after
SIGNS. That was earlier. Later he was after meanings.
Heidegger was never attempting to create any theory of SIGNS. He was after
meanings. Thus he turned into our ancient Greek heritance. And did not accept
the modern meanings attacted to the basic concepts. - He re-interpreted them.
With this he truly was in line with Peirce.
I think this is right, although the place of Being is different - although even
there some of the ways Peirce uses the copula is interesting as we discussed
back in the reading club on Natural Signs.
In 1970's ( and onwards) Peirce became kind of covertly famous in Europe. His
writings were studied by the top philosophers. But his name was seldom, if ever
mentioned.
That’s interesting. I was familiar with Derrida’s and of course Habermas but I
didn’t know there were others.
Since I read Heidegger's Time and Being, It has been quite clear to me that he
was after something akin to Peirce. - Kind of muddled Peirce, I thought.
Afterwards I read about all Heidegger has written. And was even more convinced
that my idea was valid.
I want to respond to Gary in some depth. Unfortunately my kids are starting
school, my wife is 7 months pregnant, and we have an important client coming at
work. But I am not posting and running. I think he raises some really important
issues.
-----------------------------
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with the
line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
