On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 9:05 PM Matt Faunce <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I was just looking at my comment about all things changing and therefore > the change of meanings. I now see it was not a valid criticism of Peirce's > regulative long-run confirmation of any specific proposition. I'm looking > now to see if Peirce ever said the general conception of a thing would be > confirmed in the infinite long run of inquiry. That was what I was > attacking. > I meant 'I'm looking now to see if Peirce ever said a single contained conception, however broad, of a thing would be confirmed in the infinite long run...'. Of course he didn't. I knew that. Geeez. I've gotta sharpen my game. Matt
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
