Jon, List, Just for your information , my first articles on the subject: - Marty, Robert, « Catégories et foncteurs en sémiotique », *Semiosis*, n o 6, 1977, p. 5-15 (ISSN <https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Standard_Serial_Number> 0170-219X <http://worldcat.org/issn/0170-219X&lang=fr>). - Marty, Robert, « Une formalisation de la sémiotique de C.S.Peirce à l'aide de la théorie des catégories », *Ars Semeiotica*, vol. II, no 3, 1979, p. 275-294 (ISSN <https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Standard_Serial_Number> 0171-0834 <http://worldcat.org/issn/0171-0834&lang=fr>) - Marty, Robert, « Le treillis des 28 classes de signes hexadiques », *Semiosis*, nos 25/29, 1982, p. 5-12 (ISSN <https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Standard_Serial_Number> 0170-219X <http://worldcat.org/issn/0170-219X&lang=fr>). - Marty, Robert, « C.S.Peirce phaneroscopy and semiotics », *Semiotica* , vol. 41, nos 1-4, 1982, p. 169-181 (ISSN <https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Standard_Serial_Number> 1613-3692 <http://worldcat.org/issn/1613-3692&lang=fr>) - My book : - Marty, Robert, L'algèbre des signes : essai de sémiotique scientifique d'après Charles S. Peirce, vol. 24, Amsterdam, John Benjamins, coll. « Foundations of Semiotics », 1990, 409 p. (ISBN <https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Standard_Book_Number> 9789027232960 <https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sp%C3%A9cial:Ouvrages_de_r%C3%A9f%C3%A9rence/9789027232960> )
Best regards Robert Le lun. 4 mai 2020 à 23:11, Jon Awbrey <[email protected]> a écrit : > Cf: Peirce's Categories • 16 > At: > http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2020/05/04/peirces-categories-%e2%80%a2-16/ > > A feature of particular interest to me in Robert Marty’s paper is the > resonance he finds between category theory, as > it’s known in contemporary mathematics, and the study of Peirce’s > Categories. I’ve long felt the cross-pollination of > these two fields was naturally bound to bear fruit. In that light I’ll > refer again to the “brouillon projet” I wrote on > the Precursors of Category Theory, where I trace a common theme uniting > the function of categorical paradigms from > Aristotle through Peirce to present day logic and math. > > • Precursors of Category Theory > ( https://oeis.org/wiki/Precursors_Of_Category_Theory ) > > By way of orientation to the perspective I’ll adopt in reading Marty’s > “Podium” paper, here’s the first of the excerpts > I collected, from a primer of category theory on the shelves of every > student of the subject, giving a thumbnail > genealogy of categories from classical philosophy to current mathematics. > > <QUOTE> > > Now the discovery of ideas as general as these is chiefly the willingness > to make a brash or speculative abstraction, in > this case supported by the pleasure of purloining words from the > philosophers: “Category” from Aristotle and Kant, > “Functor” from Carnap (Logische Syntax der Sprache), and “natural > transformation” from then current informal parlance. > > 🙞 Saunders Mac Lane • Categories for the Working Mathematician, 29–30. > > </QUOTE> > > Resource > ======== > > • Survey of Precursors Of Category Theory > ( > https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2015/05/15/survey-of-precursors-of-category-theory-%e2%80%a2-1/ > ) > > Regards, > > Jon > >
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
