I like ... what do you think of the presuppositions between the levels? Do they make sense to you ?
Le mer. 15 avr. 2020 à 18:41, Jon Awbrey <[email protected]> a écrit : > Robert, > > With a few choice exceptions I have always found Peirce's earlier > writings on categories, relations, and semiotics to be more clear, > exact, and fruitful in practice than his last attempts to explain > himself without the requisite logical and mathematical formalisms. > > Still, I do like that podium picture, comprehend it all or not, > and I found myself once using a similar picture to explain the > relationships among the big 3 normative sciences of aesthetics, > ethics, and logic. I called this "The Pragmatic Cosmos" using > "cosmos" in the sense of a global order. It seems most of this > stuff has fallen off the live web. Here's a few links I found: > > The Pragmatic Cosmos (Oct 2003) > > http://web.archive.org/web/20061014010215/http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2003-October/000879.html > > Inquiry Oriented Systems (Feb 2004) > 0. > http://web.archive.org/web/20070222005725/http://suo.ieee.org/ontology/thrd4.html#05337 > 1. > http://web.archive.org/web/20070302154925/http://suo.ieee.org/ontology/msg05337.html > 8. > http://web.archive.org/web/20070302155036/http://suo.ieee.org/ontology/msg05344.html > > The Pragmatic Cosmos (Mar 2012) > https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg00924.html > > Regards, > > Jon > > On 4/10/2020 6:39 PM, robert marty wrote: > > Dear colleagues hello, > > > > I submit for your review this preprint which is awaiting publication : > > > > https://academia.edu/resource/work/41574474 > > > > Here is his abstract : > > > > "This article organizes Peirce's universal categories > > and their degenerate forms from their presupposition > > relationships. These relationships are formally clarified > > on the basis of Frege's definition of presupposition. > > They are visualized in a "podium" diagram. With these > > forms, we then follow step by step the well-known and > > very often cited third Peirce Lowell Conference of 1903 > > (third draft) in which he sets out his entire method of > > analysis based on these categories. The very strong > > congruence that is established between the podium and > > the text validates the importance, even the necessity, > > of taking into account these presuppositions in order > > to correctly understand Peirce's phenomenology" > > > > > > I would be very happy to read your comments. > > > > Best regards > > > > Robert Marty > > >
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
