Robert, With a few choice exceptions I have always found Peirce's earlier writings on categories, relations, and semiotics to be more clear, exact, and fruitful in practice than his last attempts to explain himself without the requisite logical and mathematical formalisms.
Still, I do like that podium picture, comprehend it all or not, and I found myself once using a similar picture to explain the relationships among the big 3 normative sciences of aesthetics, ethics, and logic. I called this "The Pragmatic Cosmos" using "cosmos" in the sense of a global order. It seems most of this stuff has fallen off the live web. Here's a few links I found: The Pragmatic Cosmos (Oct 2003) http://web.archive.org/web/20061014010215/http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2003-October/000879.html Inquiry Oriented Systems (Feb 2004) 0. http://web.archive.org/web/20070222005725/http://suo.ieee.org/ontology/thrd4.html#05337 1. http://web.archive.org/web/20070302154925/http://suo.ieee.org/ontology/msg05337.html 8. http://web.archive.org/web/20070302155036/http://suo.ieee.org/ontology/msg05344.html The Pragmatic Cosmos (Mar 2012) https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg00924.html Regards, Jon On 4/10/2020 6:39 PM, robert marty wrote: > Dear colleagues hello, > > I submit for your review this preprint which is awaiting publication : > > https://academia.edu/resource/work/41574474 > > Here is his abstract : > > "This article organizes Peirce's universal categories > and their degenerate forms from their presupposition > relationships. These relationships are formally clarified > on the basis of Frege's definition of presupposition. > They are visualized in a "podium" diagram. With these > forms, we then follow step by step the well-known and > very often cited third Peirce Lowell Conference of 1903 > (third draft) in which he sets out his entire method of > analysis based on these categories. The very strong > congruence that is established between the podium and > the text validates the importance, even the necessity, > of taking into account these presuppositions in order > to correctly understand Peirce's phenomenology" > > > I would be very happy to read your comments. > > Best regards > > Robert Marty >
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
