Jerry C., List: No word games, just a simple request and a sincere question as I try to understand your claim as quoted. I am well aware of qualisign/sinsign/legisign as Peirce's 1903 division of all signs according to the nature of the sign itself, which he later changes to tone/token/type. I am asking what specific relation you are expressing with the arrows between them, and what specific passage(s) from Peirce's writings you can cite to support your interpretation.
Thanks again, Jon S. On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 2:50 PM Jerry LR Chandler < [email protected]> wrote: > Jon: > > The sentence you cite is merely the top row of CSP table of the trichotomy. > > If you wish to play word games, count me out. > > Cheers > Jerry > > On Aug 4, 2021, at 10:31 AM, Jon Alan Schmidt <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Jerry C., List: > > JLRC: CSP assertion of Quali-sign —> Sinsign —> Legi-sign forms the > logical and semantic grounding for the chemical sciences. > > > Please provide an exact quotation for the particular "CSP assertion" that > you have in mind. What relation are the arrows from qualisign to sinsign > and from sinsign to legisign supposed to represent? > > Thanks, > > Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA > Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christian > www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt > <http://www.linkedin.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt> - twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt > > On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 9:35 AM Jerry LR Chandler < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Helmut: >> >> As a footnote to the exceedingly curious developments of scientific >> terminologies, I would note that: >> >> 1. Robert Rosen denied the role of chemical emergence in his >> category-theory based book, Life Itself. >> 2. The Scandia school of Biosemiotics adopts the evolutionary theory >> while rejecting the chemical theory. >> 3. The formal logic advocates ignore emergence and evolution but >> nevertheless assert the implication sign as symbolic anticipation!. >> >> CSP assertion of Quali-sign —> Sinsign —> Legi-sign forms the logical and >> semantic grounding for the chemical sciences. >> Consequently, his syntactical trichotomy for the relative logics of the >> chemical table of elements also grounds the abstractions for the numerical >> logics of atomic and molecular sentences. >> >> Thus, by vague conjecture, CSP was motivated to develop the concept of >> the phanoscopy differs from the Husserl’s notion of phenomenology by the >> modal logics of conscious feelings. >> >> Cheers >> >> Jerry >> >
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . ► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with UNSUBSCRIBE PEIRCE-L in the SUBJECT LINE of the message and nothing in the body. More at https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/help/user-signoff.html . ► PEIRCE-L is owned by THE PEIRCE GROUP; moderated by Gary Richmond; and co-managed by him and Ben Udell.
