> On Sep 18, 2024, at 10:46 PM, Jon Alan Schmidt <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Every sign denotes its object and signifies its interpretant.
This assertion is scientifically grossly inadequate for the material logic necessary to prescribe the role of semiotics and syntax in the chemical sciences in the late 19th Century and going forward. CSP was not fool that this assertion suggests. The language of chemistry, then and now, necessary requires a cycle of “seme” terms in the casual reference languages of cognition and recognition. Cheers Jerry
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ARISBE: THE PEIRCE GATEWAY is now at https://cspeirce.com and, just as well, at https://www.cspeirce.com . It'll take a while to repair / update all the links! ► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . ► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with UNSUBSCRIBE PEIRCE-L in the SUBJECT LINE of the message and nothing in the body. More at https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/help/user-signoff.html . ► PEIRCE-L is owned by THE PEIRCE GROUP; moderated by Gary Richmond; and co-managed by him and Ben Udell.
