(Edited for parallelism in third sentence of the second paragraph.)

List, Gary, Tori:

Below is an abstract that does not mention the term 'teleology', but, in fact, 
IMHO and idiosyncratic philosophy, gets to the heart of the issues of 
ostension. Much is to be learned by comparing the current paper under 
discussion to this paper by Rossella Fabbrichesi.

One ought to consider that any living system must not only acquire signs from 
its current situation, but also ACT on the signification of the signals in such 
a manner AS TO PROSPER.  This necessity to act separates the mere mental from 
the existential. This necessity for action separates traditional biosemiotics 
from semiotics, chemistry from physics, perplexity from complexity. In human 
societies, this includes the genesis and sustaining of the community, the 
common social and cultural structures inherited from the past generations. In 
short, the problem is not one in which a sign generates an infinite ingress 
into further signs, but rather that the living system creates actions from the 
signs. 

Idiosyncratically Yours

Cheers

Jerry



Iconic thought and diagrammatical scripture:
Peirce and the Leibnizian tradition
ROSSELLA FABBRICHESI
Abstract
I will sustain in this article that Peirce can be seen as the last great 
representative
of that inconspicuous but persistent tradition that, from the thirteenth to
the seventeenth century, spent its energies on discovering a universal language.
His project of Existential Graphs is in fact grounded on the isomorphism
among a Sheet of Assertion, in which Graphs-signs are drawn, a Mind, with its
thoughts-signs, and the Universe, with its facts-signs. In the same sense, 
Leibniz
worked on his Characteristica Universalis, seen as a general Encyclopedia
or alphabet of human thoughts, and a pictum mundi amphitheatrum.
Keywords: Peirce; Leibniz; existential graphs; Characteristica Universalis;
universal language; icon

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the PEIRCE-L 
listserv.  To remove yourself from this list, send a message to 
[email protected] with the line "SIGNOFF PEIRCE-L" in the body of the 
message.  To post a message to the list, send it to [email protected]

Reply via email to