Steven, List,
 
I think you are making an interesting and important point here in terms of 
contemporary terminology,  so I want to look into it further. I remember 
considering that aspect of your work to be found at the site you just linked to 
a while back and at Joe's urging, but I want to do so again in light of my 
growing interest in, especially, biosemiotics.
 
While I concur that Peirce would have certainly agreed that the position that 
"our understanding of the physical world is complete in all important respects" 
is unscientific, he strove with all his might to overcome the Cartesian dualism 
which he saw evident in most of the science of his day. So, I'll try to be more 
current in my usage of "reductionism" in the future. 
 
Best,
 
Gary
 
 
Gary Richmond
Philosophy and Critical Thinking
Communication Studies
LaGuardia College of the City University of New York
```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
718 482-5700


>>> Steven Ericsson-Zenith <[email protected]> 8/16/2011 3:39 PM >>>
On Aug 16, 2011, at 11:41 AM, Gary Richmond wrote:

> Reductionism in science doesn't, of course, allow for any such thing.

I followed you and if I understand you correctly agree until this point. 
Although commonly misinterpreted by a 20th Century bias, "Reductionism" does 
not actually refer to reduction to "materialism," the view that our 
understanding of the physical world is complete in all important respects. As 
Penrose has pointed out repeatedly over the past two decades and more, it 
clearly is not. Further, such a point of view is not scientific. I think that 
Peirce would have agreed.

Logical reductionism can be rescued if this is made clear. I elaborate on this 
point in my work at:

http://senses.info

With respect,
Steven

--
Dr. Steven Ericsson-Zenith
Institute for Advanced Science & Engineering
http://senses.info

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the PEIRCE-L 
listserv.  To remove yourself from this list, send a message to 
[email protected] with the line "SIGNOFF PEIRCE-L" in the body of the 
message.  To post a message to the list, send it to [email protected]

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the PEIRCE-L 
listserv.  To remove yourself from this list, send a message to 
[email protected] with the line "SIGNOFF PEIRCE-L" in the body of the 
message.  To post a message to the list, send it to [email protected]

Reply via email to