Well, we are all trying to escape Cartesian dualism. :-) I'm less sure that 
Peirce succeeded but acknowledge that he certainly tried.

Steven


On Aug 16, 2011, at 12:59 PM, Gary Richmond wrote:

> Steven, List,
>  
> I think you are making an interesting and important point here in terms of 
> contemporary terminology,  so I want to look into it further. I remember 
> considering that aspect of your work to be found at the site you just linked 
> to a while back and at Joe's urging, but I want to do so again in light of my 
> growing interest in, especially, biosemiotics.
>  
> While I concur that Peirce would have certainly agreed that the position that 
> "our understanding of the physical world is complete in all important 
> respects" is unscientific, he strove with all his might to overcome the 
> Cartesian dualism which he saw evident in most of the science of his day. So, 
> I'll try to be more current in my usage of "reductionism" in the future.
>  
> Best,
>  
> Gary
>  
>  
> Gary Richmond
> Philosophy and Critical Thinking
> Communication Studies
> LaGuardia College of the City University of New York
> ```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
> 718 482-5700
> 
> 
> >>> Steven Ericsson-Zenith <[email protected]> 8/16/2011 3:39 PM >>>
> On Aug 16, 2011, at 11:41 AM, Gary Richmond wrote:
> 
> > Reductionism in science doesn't, of course, allow for any such thing.
> 
> I followed you and if I understand you correctly agree until this point. 
> Although commonly misinterpreted by a 20th Century bias, "Reductionism" does 
> not actually refer to reduction to "materialism," the view that our 
> understanding of the physical world is complete in all important respects. As 
> Penrose has pointed out repeatedly over the past two decades and more, it 
> clearly is not. Further, such a point of view is not scientific. I think that 
> Peirce would have agreed.
> 
> Logical reductionism can be rescued if this is made clear. I elaborate on 
> this point in my work at:
> 
> http://senses.info
> 
> With respect,
> Steven
> 
> --
> Dr. Steven Ericsson-Zenith
> Institute for Advanced Science & Engineering
> http://senses.info
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the PEIRCE-L 
> listserv.  To remove yourself from this list, send a message to 
> [email protected] with the line "SIGNOFF PEIRCE-L" in the body of 
> the message.  To post a message to the list, send it to 
> [email protected]
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the PEIRCE-L 
> listserv. To remove yourself from this list, send a message to 
> [email protected] with the line "SIGNOFF PEIRCE-L" in the body of 
> the message. To post a message to the list, send it to 
> [email protected]

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the PEIRCE-L 
listserv.  To remove yourself from this list, send a message to 
[email protected] with the line "SIGNOFF PEIRCE-L" in the body of the 
message.  To post a message to the list, send it to [email protected]

Reply via email to