Jim, Joe et al.,
25.9.2006 kello 20:22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] kirjoitti:
JW: <x-tad-bigger>The explanation is teleological. What causes people to avoid changing their opinions? Why do people avoid changing their opinions? Peirce says,</x-tad-bigger>
<x-tad-bigger>1. an instinctive dislike of an undecided state of mind.... makes men cling spasmodically to the views they already take.</x-tad-bigger>
<x-tad-bigger>2. a steady and immovable faith yields great peace of mind. (sec. 5 FOB)</x-tad-bigger>
What I'm curious about, is whether Peirce ever referred to these two as LAWS of mind. He may have considered them as psychological tendencies, or something like that (something empirical psychology could investigate).
<x-tad-bigger>
In my first response to Joe, I took the first question to be answered to be: whether Peirce is referring to his conceptions of laws of mind or to something established by the special science psychology.
IF Peirce is referring to his own conceptions (arrived at by meticulous experimentation on himself), then I can't see but two candidates. The law of association, which Peirce takes up as THE Law of Mind. This is the only law Peirce, to my mind, could have considered exclusively mental. The second candidate would be the law of habit.
But I'm somewhat in a loss here, because these views are a based on reading Collected Papers. With consequent difficulties in delineating the development of Peirce's views.
</x-tad-bigger>Kirsti Määttänen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
