> Ricardo: This is over!!!! The subject is exhausted. That depends on how much depth a person wants. I think I have said something different in every post except when clarity required it. I was just about to examine Wood's argument in light of some recent research - sources which no one has ever mentioned in this list, and which therefore could not have beed exhausted. Comninel has just published a long (54 page) article in the Journal of Peasants Studies on this very subject. Or, if you think you have exhausted this subject, perhaps you should tell us. But am no stupid, I know the problem is really me, otherwise I wonder why you're allowing the endless repetitions going on in the other two threads on "incomplete abstractions" and "slavery"???
- Re: E. Wood's defence of B... Yoshie Furuhashi
- E. Wood's defence of Brenn... Ricardo Duchesne
- E. Wood's defence of Brenn... Ricardo Duchesne
- E. Wood's defence of Brenn... Ricardo Duchesne
- E. Wood's defence of Brenn... Ricardo Duchesne
- RE: E. Wood's defence of B... Lisa & Ian Murray
- Re: RE: E. Wood's defence ... Jim Devine
- E. Wood's defence of Brenn... Ricardo Duchesne
- E. Wood's defence of Brenn... Ricardo Duchesne
- Re: E. Wood's defence of B... Michael Perelman
- Re: E. Wood's defence of B... Ricardo Duchesne
- Re: E. Wood's defence of B... Michael Perelman
- P.K. O'Brien on why Britai... Ricardo Duchesne
- Re: P.K. O'Brien on why Br... Ricardo Duchesne
- Re: Re: E. Wood's defence ... Louis Proyect
- Re: guns, germs, steel Charles Brown
- Re: Re: guns, germs, steel Ricardo Duchesne
- Re: Re: guns, germs, steel Charles Brown
- Re: Re: Re: guns, germs, steel Brad De Long
- Re: guns, germs, steel Louis Proyect
- Re: Re: Re: guns, germs, steel Charles Brown