>[was: Re: [PEN-L:13301] Re: Hardt-Negri "Empire" statistics]
>
>>Carrol Cox:
>>>Do you mean that no one can understand Marx without owning the
>>>Verso/Vintage edition of _Capital_?
>>>
>>>Or do you merely mean the final chapter of _Capital_, entitled
>>>differently in that edition?
>
>Tom Walker writes:
>>The chapter at the end of the Verso/Vintage edition is based on a manuscript
>>"chapter 6" that was left out of the original published editions of capital.
>>So, yes, you would have to have that edition to read that chapter.
>
>but real vs. formal subjection of labor was defined or at least
>mentioned in the text of the shorter version of CAPITAL, in chapter
>16. It corresponds roughly (or exactly?) to the distinction between
>absolute and relative surplus-value extraction.
>
>However, I do think that it's well worth one's while to read the
>"Results of the Immediate Process of Production" at the end of the
>Penguin/Vintage edition.
>
>Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] & http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine
What's the German word that is usually translated as "subsumption"?
just curious,
Yoshie
