To me the more interesting issue is this: when a system in motions is perturbed is
there any reason to believe it will return to the stationary state. I do believe
that we can identify the laws of motion of capitalism. But, I'm not sure there is
any reason to believe that entrepreneurs will systematically avoid errors or that
systematic processes of market coordination are plausible.
Julio Huato wrote:
Just to wrap up this idea: "In spite of the etymology of the term, in
dynamics, a state is not stasis. Instead, it's ("simplified" or
"idealized") motion."
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
