Greetings Economists,
On Jun 18, 2008, at 5:12 AM, Doug Henwood wrote:
and very little to poor regions like Africa.
Doyle;
The U.S. is in competition with China in the Sudan and elsewhere.
South Africa is said to be a BRIC component. I suspect that a
consequence of U.S. decline is further spread of development outside
of Asia. I'm especially cautious at the sense that Africa has no
future within the current capitalist structure.
With the U.S. as world dominant power counter trends are suppressed.
The rise of many centers asks the question of how to build upon rising
development.
Within that as is obvious, sustainable technology adjusted to global
climate change. It is in the interest of BRIC to alter and sustain
their part of global power. Brazil, and South Africa seem likely
centers of development, and that very change is likely in the context
of global climate change initiatives. Decentralized sun power energy
for example favors Africa as a continent.
thanks,
Doyle Saylor
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
