On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 4:06 PM, Julio Huato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Re. Doug's reply. Even if this plan used up $700 billion, it'd be > infinitely better than the Paulson plan. I'm not saying we have the > same chance of passing a progressive rescue plan as Paulson has of > passing a regressive one. But why not argue for it? I can understand > arguing about this or that detail, but I think we should on board on > the principle. No?
Hi Julio, Have you contacted Obama's team with this? What is their reaction? I think you referred to a less than positive response earlier in the thread but I don't recall seeing details. -raghu. -- "Really ?? What a coincidence, I'm shallow too!!" _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
