Sandwichman wrote: > But talking about shorter hours > is anathema to post-Samuelson > Anglo-American economists. Why? > You need to talk about ingredient > three, Paul. NOW NOW NOW.
IMHO, the underlying issue is the enormous economic security facing U.S. workers nowadays and in the recent past. Under those circumstances, leisure is not a very top priority. Jobs, health care, serious unemployment insurance, collective bargaining, basic rights of union organizing are top. I think that working people are ready now to pay attention to *propaganda* on shortening the working day, week, month, and year, but they are not equally ready to turn that into an immediate demand. _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
