Greetings Economists,
On Nov 9, 2008, at 5:46 PM, ken hanly wrote:
I have not heard that there is some huge antiwar reaction to that
would change Obama's thinking on this. Obama also wants to enlarge
the military not shrink it. Obama continues to threaten Russia by
supporting the inclusion of the Ukraine and Georgia into NATO.
Doyle;
These changes are where I think the reformist boundaries are set for
the time being. Will these arise as change areas during Obama's
term? I think if these start to shift more than likely we have moved
past reformism in some fundamental way. So I would like to hear some
discussion of what would push us to the breaking point of hegemonic
power for the U.S. I think that is what you are asking. And I also
think it clear that reformism has a certain agenda it must do to be
called reformism. Without 'reformism' happening Obama fails. I do
not think Obama can move things out of reformism and it is not
realistic to expect that. I think reformism can't stop a left being
formed in the U.S. either. Reformism depends upon a left forming. I
take SD as reformist. And prepared to set the limits of reform
against a leftist challenge.
thanks,
Doyle Saylor
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
