Paul Baer wrote: > > > Obviously Move-on - of which I'm an opportunistic member - is a > relevant example here. What its lessons are, is far from obvious. It > was constructed around a vision of a distributed organization for > lobbying congress. The Obama network can obviously do something > similar (and no-doubt it overlaps substantially with Move-on > already).
Carl Davidson once referred to Move-On as 8 people and a maillist. Its local followers in Bloomington/Normal Illinois seemed to be zealous followers of its party-line, but there is nothing in its structure or mode of operation to hold individuals or local groups beyond their shared loyalty to the DP, and if that loyalty becomes weak in any of its local camp-followeres, to that extent Move-On would be weakened. Carrol _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
