Carrol Cox wrote: > Any of these specualtions (Doug's or Jim's) MAY be correct -- but they > do represent an attempt at mind-reading, because they deal with Obama's > HIDDEN motive. The only view that corresponds _directly_ to observed > data is that Obama BELIEVES, REALLY BELIEVES, that there should be a tax > cut. > > I don't think political judgments should be grounded in mind-reading.
how else are we to get some idea of what BHO is going to do in the future? treat his statements as true at face value? -- Jim Devine / "Segui il tuo corso, e lascia dir le genti." (Go your own way and let people talk.) -- Karl, paraphrasing Dante. _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
