On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:54:52 -0800 raghu <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 5:48 PM, Doug Henwood <[email protected]> wrote: > > Really? "Objectively" what we know so far is who the guy has appointed, and > > the appointments have been, with almost no exception, centrists. On the > > Middle East, they're outrageously awful. > > > I don't disagree. I just don't see how we can infer "purpose" rather > than "caution" from this which is what Michael Smith suggested.
Hmmm. Interesting meta-question: Which is the null hypothesis? -- Michael Smith [email protected] http://stopmebeforeivoteagain.org _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
