On Jan 13, 2009, at 7:10 PM, raghu wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Michael Smith <[email protected]>
wrote:
Appointing anti-progressives like Larry Summers. Temporizing and/or
sending mixed signals about issues like Palestine, Guantanamo etc.
Has anybody considered that perhaps these represent neither
failure nor caution, but *purpose*?
That is a very cynical viewpoint and while it may be fashionable among
the left, I don't believe it is objectively justified by what we know
so far.
Really? "Objectively" what we know so far is who the guy has
appointed, and the appointments have been, with almost no exception,
centrists. On the Middle East, they're outrageously awful.
Doug
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
