Ravi writes: >> Please read responses from me, Sean and Joanna which answer the above.
I read them. I really do enjoy these exchanges. Again, and I am generalizing, each of you wants to debate or prove to me that I am wrong in thinking charter schools are better, or that little Johnny should have a choice, or that his parents know what is better for little Johnny, or that little Johnny's needs are more imporant than the interests of the other children. That I am wedded to "methodological individualism" and other such monstrosities. All very interesting and when the economy recovers and I am not so busy, we can debate these issues for as long as Michael permits. But these arguments have nothing to do with what I wanted to talk about, which was an observation about you, the progressives, and how you think. Every one of your posts, every one (with the possible late exception of Max Sawicky), was nothing more than an admission I was right about how you think, which I will repeat for the umpteenth time: even if going to a charter school was better for littl! e Johnny, you would oppose little Johnny going because it is not in the best interest of the abandoned school and remaining children. There is no need for you to tell me you are correct in thinking how you do and I am wrong for not agreeing with you. It really is not necessary. David Shemano _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
