On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 10:15 +0100, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 15:28 -0500, c b wrote:
> > CB: On climate change, actually, the new technology of the internet
> > can give you things that in the past would require going to a
> > university library and perhaps climatology classes.  With your
> > critical thinking skills applied you can get for yourself a
> > preliminary solid answer to your question as to whether climate change
> > is occurring. There is a history on this of a number of skeptics
> > raising questions, which I'm sure are readily avaiblable from a search
> > engine search.
> 
> If you're looking for an interesting case:
> 
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_McIntyre
> http://www.climateaudit.org/
> 
> By looking at government processed temperature data this guy found
> some anomaly, asked for source code and raw data but was denied his
> request. In the end the government scientist acknowleged there was a bug
> and thanked him.
> 
> *But* raw unprocessed data on temperature collected using taxpayer
> funding, processing software and many other aspects of climate science
> still remains totally secret even after this affair.
> 
> Now of course there is one category of people who tend to want to keep
> data secret: politicians. When I see so called "scientists" hide
> raw data from the public eye I see politicians not scientists.
> 
> Now it's very likely to me that pumping carbon in the atmosphere at
> the scale and speed mankind has been doing will have major
> consequences. 
> 
> But in the internet age not making raw data public is a major
> shortcoming transforming in practice science/knowledge into
> religion/belief and making any informed and constructive debate
> impossible.
> 
> See also my previous post on public data.

A leak of emails announced yesterday put this lack of transparency in
the spotlight again:

http://www.eurotrib.com/story/2009/11/21/74255/570
<<
News of the moment is how email correspondence and some data from the
Climate Research Unit (CRU) of the University of East Anglia has been
hacked from a webmail server and is now circulating across the internet.
The news was posted here and already includes some of the emails (in a
censored format) from the hack. There is presently a torrent download
available, here.
[...]
>>

A nice quote:

<<
"We have 25 or so years invested in the work. Why should I make the data
available to you, when your aim is to try and find something wrong with
it." (Jones' reply to Warwick Hughes, 21. Februar 2005; confirmed by P.
Jones)
>>

Laurent



_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to