Jim, this is political.


US businesses want the specter raised by Obama’s election (a mobilized
public, rationally interested in basic principles of social justice) fully
vanquished before they accept a greater government role in the management of
the economy. Yes I agree that US business does not and should not have much
too fear in the way of price increases of inputs (but don’t forget the
commodity inflation that results from Western growth coupled with Asian
growth) or an intrusive government (Obama is not in fact Robin Hood or a
black reparationist), but many US businessmen do seem to be worried about
such effects from greater autonomous government expenditures (especially if
they are successful)  and seem to be willing to sacrifice a few bucks in
their pockets to keep these fears at bay. And, as you say, whatever money
they lose they will try to make up negotiating long-term contracts.



I am not sure what your last point is, but it reads as if you are blaming
monetary expansion for overcapacity. Why was there “excessive private debt”?
What does excessive mean?


When talking about protectionism, I had that Lazy Boy vs. China story in
mind.
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to