Doug wrote:

> In other words, the allocation of funds in the
> present. A society as a whole can't save for the
> future the way individuals can. Yes, we've
> largely pissed away the proceeds of the borrowing,
> and probably reduced future incomes as a result.
> But that doesn't change the fact that the benefits
> will have to be paid out of future incomes, not
> today's savings.

Jim wrote:

> exactly.

Guys,

We need to see beneath the veil of money.

What people, as individuals, "save" today is *not* future wealth, but
legal rights or (viewed from the other side) obligations contracted
among one another over the disposition of future wealth.  Future
wealth is whatever wealth happens to be available in the future, and
for the most part wealth has to be (re)produced.

Needs at time t can *only* be satisfied by wealth (goods) extant at
time t, regardless of how the legal claims over that wealth may be
allocated before, then, or after.  Revolutions are precisely the reset
button with which societies alter the allocation of those rights or
obligations.  The *real* issue then is who -- which class or group of
people -- is going to appropriate the wealth existing at t, i.e.
whether none/some/all needs of working people will be met at t --
where t may be today (t=0) or some near or distant point in the future
(t=k>0).

So, there are two issues here.  Issue one: At t=0, we should not let
the true sources of wealth (the natural environment and us, human
beings) be destroyed or left to decay.  We have to preserve the
ultimate and true sources of wealth, and that can only be done to the
extent the needs of working people are met *today*.

Issue two: Since t=k>0 will arrive, provided we humans are still
around for that to matter, then we need to do *today* whatever
possible to arrange things in such a way that when t=k>0 arrives, we
are in a better position to make human life worth living, i.e. to have
the true sources of wealth not only preserved but duly expanded and
enriched.

We need to reject this notion that under capitalism, what individuals
"save" privately, has some existence independent of the aggregate
reality of our material reproduction as a society.
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to