Once the bookkeeping illusion is torn away, it can be pointed out that for 100k or thereabouts the younger generation of homo sapiens has care for the older. Why should accounting nonsense change that fact. What are progressive economists good for if they can't produce agitational marterial.
Carrol On 4/28/2011 5:37 PM, Carrol Cox wrote: > I have heard that FDR claimed/thought that making it nominally an > insurance program would protect it. But all illusions/delusions can be > manipulated by those who control the media and the state. > > But I was only a bit facetious in my earlier post. A leaflet size > explanation tearing away the myth of "insurance" would be of great > value. This is going to be an ongoing battle, and we need ammunition for > it. Surprisingly perhaps, the clearest explanation of the myth was by a > former president of the American Econics Association (or whatever they > call it) published as an op-ed in the WSJ back in the '80s. > > Carrol > _______________________________________________ > pen-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l > _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
