I think he's talking about the separation of conception (of orders)
from execution (following those orders) and the use of the objective
mechanism of machinery to give managers a monopoly over the former,
leaving the workers doing only the latter.

On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 1:01 PM, nathan tankus
<[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm in the process of listening through volume one of capital. I've come to
> this part and want some input:
>
>
> "Nevertheless an essential difference at once manifests itself. In
> Manufacture it is the workmen who, with their manual implements, must,
> either singly or in groups, carry on each particular detail process. If, on
> the one hand, the workman becomes adapted to the process, on the other, the
> process was previously made suitable to the workman. This subjective
> principle of the division of labour no longer exists in production by
> machinery. Here, the process as a whole is examined objectively, in itself,
> that is to say, without regard to the question of its execution by human
> hands, it is analysed into its constituent phases; and the problem, how to
> execute each detail process, and bind them all into a whole, is solved by
> the aid of machines, chemistry, &c. [17] But, of course, in this case also,
> theory must be perfected by accumulated experience on a large scale."
>
> http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1867-c1/ch15.htm#S1
>
> When Marx talks about the transition from subjective principles of
> production to objective principles of production, does he mean that
> production shifts from needing direct applications of human skill and muscle
> (and thus human intellect) to functioning without direct applications of
> human skill and muscle? Or am i missing something about the meaning of
> subjective and objective here?
>
> --
> -Nathan Tankus
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pen-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
>



-- 
Jim Devine / If you're going to support the lesser of two evils, you
should at least know the nature of that evil.
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to