"Tom Walker" <[email protected]> wrote: 

> I said nothing whatsoever about economic "progress." I specifically 
> challenged the meaningfulness of the 
> notion of economic "growth". Economic progress, by contrast, would require 
> discarding the obsolete 
> and discredited terminology from the mid-1950s. 

How do you define economic progress? And how was terminology from the Mid-1950s 
discredited? 
Are you throwing Marx out with the bathwater? 

-- 
Ron 

_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to